See Me At A New Time and Place

Some fellow Notre Dame enthusiasts have invited me to contibute my prose at their site.

Please continue to view my work here. I appreciate your continued support.

Go Irish!

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

A Weis Update

I know I've been pretty critical of Weis lately. Our performance on the field has been less than stellar and there is no excuse for it. That said, some things Weis has said over the past few days, along with the recruiting success of hauling in Michael Floyd and Jonas Gray despite our on-the-field struggles, has really got me thinking. I haven't quite swung back to the pro-Weis side, but I currently stand on a little bit more middle ground.

I have documented in several posts this season (archived on the right) the shortcomings of Weis and our team. It seems that many of our problems this year have been out of Weis' control, so to speak. He had very little to do with the lack of bodies and talent in the upper three classes (although he did run quite a few of them off when he first arrived) leading to inexperience and a lack of depth at many positions. And he had little to do with a front-loaded schedule. Other problems, like a lack of leadership, determined play, being ready to play at the beginning of the game, and a nasty attitude I would say are on both the players and Weis. Finally, some of the problems seemed to be primarily (and blatantly) basic coaching errors.

The poor special teams is one area I pin solely on Weis. He knows how they can change a game, he said it in one of his very first press conferences. But he hasn't shown that he's been able to improve them. This must be fixed very quickly. Virginia Tech has shown how special teams can win you games, but they can just as easily lose you games. The poor offensive performance I don't place solely on Weis, some of it is due to being young and inexperienced at many positions and facing some pretty good defenses. But I do blame him for the lack of commitment to one type of offensive philosophy, his inability or unwillingness to simplify things in the scheme, the delay in development our offense suffered from installing the spread in the fall, and the ineptitude of a running game that would take pressure off his young offensive line and quarterback. Some of these things are a "NFL vs. college" type of coaching difference. Most of this seems so obvious to me because I've only worked with football at the high school level where player development, creating a winning and championship attitude with the team, and simplification of scheme are of vital importance. Some of these things are a lack of head coaching experience. In both cases these things are fixable.

If Weis can learn from his mistakes, trying to out-scheme everyone, not simplifying the offense for a young team, not being ready for the "speed of the game," not creating a physical atmosphere in practice, not placing enough emphasis and focus on improving special teams, etc. then this can be fixed in the future. It seems to me that he hasn't learned so far this season because he was so bent on trying to win the next game he didn't look at the bigger picture. He didn't see that these problems stem from a larger, more encompassing issue, one that will take some time to fix. By trying to install the spread in the fall and out-scheme everyone early on in the year and by not hitting in practice he developed an attitude and environment that is not conducive to being a successful college football team. He didn't build toughness, leadership, or an identity, an area in which the offense could excel and take pride. His "NFL style" of coaching failed.

During his first few years with an older, more experienced team his "NFL style" of coaching worked. But with a younger team who had yet to learn about game speed, physical play at the college level relative to the high school level, and the complexities of a pro-style offense, it failed miserably (I realize this is simplifying the issue a little bit and there are other things that have contributed to the differences between this year and the past two). He further perpetuated the problem by enforcing his will rather than identifying the problem in the fall and working to solve it before and during the season. In some ways, based on what he has said, I think he did realize some of these things. But he didn't a) realize how big of a problem they would be and/or b) know how to fix it due to his lack of college head coaching experience. Even polling his assistant coaches for answers did him so good because the problem developed into something too large, too encompassing.

I said before (link here) that he may never have to face this situation again. It may be that we develop talent and depth throughout each class from his recruiting. But it may be a good thing that this disastrous season did happen. It may have forced Weis to learn these things in the only way that he could. As painful as it has been for us, the fans, for someone so arrogant and stubborn having a disastrous season like this may have been the only thing to really wake up him to the problem. If it hadn't been so bad, he might never have fully understood these things to the degrees in which they can effect a college football team. The question is, will he learn how to fix it going forward, and apply it to the more tangential aspects of college coaching like player development and creating leaders on the team to motivate their peers.

By all accounts Weis is intelligence. He was an excellent NFL offensive coordinator where the chess match of football is played at the highest level. Learning the failings in his recruiting effort from last year and applying them to this year has resulted in a #1 ranked class. The question is will he be able to learn and improve the same way in his coaching as he has in recruiting. He is also very hard working. Combine intelligence and hard work and I find it tough to believe he is incapable of learning from his mistakes and correcting them in the future.

Over the last couple of days Weis has said things like "To be honest with you, if things don't progress, on what basis would you go into the spring thinking that everything is going to be OK?", "I'm no different than the rest of you guys. I have to see evidence that we're making progress.", "I probably adapted more this year than I have in my whole coaching career.", and “I never thought I would entertain hitting during the season, but I think it has made us better so it is something I would have to entertain.” To me this indicates he is realizing things. Heck, last game he kicked off to try and change his approach. He has even informed the seniors that for the rest of the season he will be trying to play the younger guys much more to further their development and get the team pointed in the right direction by season's end. It has to be out with the old, in with the new, at least in some aspects of his coaching style, albeit without changing his coaching philosophy.

Two concerns, however, still loom. The first I have elaborated on and alluded to before (link here). Weis, while trying to fix things with different approaches and new solutions, seems to be unable to identify the root of the problem and solve it. In the very least, he hasn't been able to effectively execute the solution(s) to the problem(s) he has identified. To further compound this issue, trying new things can be confusing and represent a lack of continuity/confidence on bahalf of the head coach.

The second concern lies in how he treats the players. With the number of transfers and the recent move to "forgo" the playing time of fifth year seniors who gave their time, energy, effort, and (in some cases) draft status to play on such a disappointing team, a damaging message can be communicated to the players: a win at all costs attitude. Weis has made it no secret that the best player will always play. I have no problem with that. But he has to take care of all the players, and they all have to know he cares about their development as a person and a football player. Without this, he will never have their trust or devotion. He has to constantly push them to become better, to tactfully illustrate their weaknesses, to develop their strengths, and to help them get into a better position to get onto the field.

Only time will tell if Weis is the person to lead us back to yearly dominance in the college football world. Currently signs point to yes and no. But we do have an intelligent and hardworking head coach who, at least at the moment, seems to be capable of learning from his mistakes and getting us righted back in the proper direction.

1 comments:

Pat Scoggins said...

Two quick comments in response to this commentary on Weis, and specifically, regarding the two concerns that you mentioned still loom.

I'll start with the second one you mentioned: the damaging way in which he treats his players. I really think that this is one of Weis's best attributes as a coach. I think I disagree with you on this item. It sounds like you may not have heard his press conference this week, but he did address the balance between playing the young guys to get some meaningful game experience for next year versus paying respect to the guys that came back for a 5th year. I think what he said was excellent. He said that he's not going to put in the youngsters at the expense of putting the best players on the field. He wants to play to win these last 4 games. He intends to play the guys that deserve the playing time because they were kind enough to come back for this mess. He also intends to get these youngsters in the game because last year he really did fail to get playing time for the backups who are now the starters this year. He's learned from his mistake and he's going to fix it by not repeating the same mistake this year. I think his comment was respectful and indicative of the fact that he does have both the courtesy to treat his 5th year guys with dignity and also the interests of the future of the program at heart. In this way, he's is taking care of all of his players in my mind. He has said on several occasions that Notre Dame is different because we expect all our players to graduate = he cares about their development as a person. With players entering the draft, he has been an honest advisor = he cares about their development as a football player. This year, with the young/inexperienced team he has softened his tough-love approach to, as he says, keep them out of the tank. I honestly think he cares about his players and he has said many things on several occasions that give me that impression.

Now to the first one you mentioned: inability to identify the root of the problem and solve it. Specifically, I'm going to talk about his inability to get to and solve the root of the offensive problems. In recent interviews, Weis has claimed that he is trying to avoid a grab-back approach to his offensive plan week to week, but he is changing some things week to week in order to fix the problem. I sort of feel like he's talking out of both sides of his mouth. How can he say he's not taking a grab-bag approach, yet every week he actually is doing something new? It might just be that I'm not astute enough to understand that the things he changes week to week are subtle in nature and not a total change in offensive identity. He has also said recently that one of the things that he thinks is keeping the spirit of the team up is that the players know he's working as hard as he can to identify and fix problems; the presumption being that he might loose the team if he refused to adapt/flex/change.

I feel bad for him and this team because he's really between a rock and a hard place. If he sticks to one approach irrespective of the fact that it's not working, then he looses the team because they think he's not trying anything new to fix the problem, but if he's changing things every week to fix the problems, the team doesn't practice an offense with any continuity and they never get good at anything. I feel like, after watching the offense we have fielded this year, that we are really a victim of the lack of being really good at anything because we're changing too much. Anthony has been saying this for a while now, that summer practice should have started out by installing fewer plays and getting really good at them. At least if Weis had done that, then we would be able to convert some 3rd downs because we could dip into that well of plays that he knows we can execute. Instead, we don't have any plays that we can consistently execute. We needed to drill those base plays so that we can execute them flawlessly. I really expected to see those plays installed and recurring after the Michigan game when we supposedly went back to training camp. But there still isn't a group of plays which we see every week that we can actually execute... meaning Weis doesn't have that well of plays to dip into. This just blows my mind and it's got to be frustrating for the players. They don't have a play where they can get in the huddle and look at each other and say, "hey guys, we're gonna get 6 yards on this play." Weis hasn't given them a chance to have a play like that.

Talent is no longer and excuse for us... now it's total lack of execution. Hopefully the lack of execution is explained easily by inexperience but believe it or not, there are teams that are inexperienced that are successful because the coach was smart enough to keep the plays simple or at least practice fewer plays and get good at them. Weis has really lead the team astray by choosing or failing not to do this.